Last updated May 17th, 2019
- 22 Apr 2019 20:24:03 PDT, (32.903, -115.512), depth 17.0km, 8km NE of Imperial, California
- Aftershocks: so far (17 May 2019, 08:37AM PDT) there have been 46 aftershocks recorded, the largest M2.9 (smallest M1.0). More may be expected in the next few days, the largest expected is approximately 1 magnitude unit smaller than the mainshock. There is a small chance (about 5%) that a larger quake could occur, with the likelihood decreasing over time.
- There were 4 events during the 3 days prior to the earthquake (within a 10 km radius), the largest was M2.2 (2019/04/23).
- Historical seismicity: since our records began in 1932 we’ve had 92 events of M4 or greater within 10km of today’s event, the largest was M6.9 (1940/05/19) and the most recent was M4.2 on 28 Aug 2012.
- CFM fault associations: most likely Imperial fault; Edip segment (28.9%). Alternates: Not associated with a CFM modeled fault (19.7%), Other CFM faults (51.4%).*
- Nearby faults: Imperial fault (2.7 km), Brawley seismic zone (Brawley fault zone) (3.0 km), Brawley seismic zone (4.2 km), San Jacinto fault zone, Superstition Hills section (Wienert fault) (12.3 km), San Jacinto fault zone, Superstition Hills section (Superstition Hills flt) (13.9 km) and Brawley seismic zone (Rico fault) (14.7 km).**
- Links for: USGS earthquake page, ShakeMap, DYFI, waveforms.
- Visit our special reports page for further information on local notable earthquakes.
Below are the waveform data associated with this event, as recorded in our Live Seismograms Feed.
*Earthquakes can occur both near or on major known faults, and in places where no clear fault zones are known. Using the statistical method of Evans et al. (in prep. 2019) the location and focal mechanism of this earthquake suggest the above association with modeled faults in the Community Fault Model (CFM) provided by the Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC) and Harvard University. Note that the CFM fault association may be different from the nearby faults list. Differences may arise due to different fault databases, and because the CFM fault association uses the hypocenter with relation to subsurface 3-dimensional fault orientation models, while the nearby faults list utilizes mapped surface traces as they relate to the epicenter.
CFM Fault: SCEC CFM 5.0 Fault name and closest segment if available; The CFM is maintained by Harvard University, Dept of Earth & Planetary Sciences.
Probability: The probability in percent the earthquake is associated with this fault.
SCSN: Caltech/USGS Southern California Seismic Network
**U.S. Geological Survey and California Geological Survey, 2006, Quaternary fault and fold database for the United States, accessed 2015, from USGS web site: https://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/qfaults/
This information is subject to change as more up-to-date data become available.